Skip to main content

RL in Gridworld, a few questions...

 1. How the Values of Each Cell Are Calculated

In Gridworld, the value of each cell (state) is computed using the Bellman Equation, which balances immediate rewards and future discounted rewards. For a state :
  • : Value of the current state.
  • : Action taken in state .
  • : Probability of transitioning to state after action .
  • : Immediate reward for transitioning to .
  • : Discount factor (0 ≤ ≤ 1).
Example:
  • If moving "right" from state leads to state with reward (step cost) and , the contribution to for this action is .
  • The value is the maximum of such contributions across all actions.
Values are iteratively updated (e.g., via value iteration) until convergence to the optimal value function.

2. Does Gamma Affect Shortest Path Preference?
Yes, influences path selection if there are step costs (e.g., per step).
  • If :
    • Future rewards are valued equally with immediate rewards.
    • The agent prioritizes minimizing step costs (e.g., shorter paths) to maximize cumulative rewards.
    • Example: A path with 5 steps (total cost = -0.05) is better than a path with 10 steps (total cost = -0.10), even if both reach the goal.
  • If :
    • Future rewards are discounted.
    • The agent prefers shorter paths to "lock in" the goal reward sooner (e.g., > ).
    • Example: With , a 5-step path yields , while a 10-step path yields .
If there are no step costs:
  • has no impact on path length, as the total reward is always 10 (goal reward).
  • The agent can take any path (long or short) without penalty.

Summary:
  • Values are computed via the Bellman Equation, incorporating rewards and discounted future values.
  • Gamma affects shortest-path preference only if step costs exist. Higher (closer to 1) still prioritizes shorter paths due to cumulative cost minimization, while lower amplifies this effect by devaluing delayed rewards.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Long Term Memory Technology Comparison

Let’s compare traditional databases , graph databases , and LLM network memory in terms of accuracy , structured data , and retrieval . 1. Accuracy Aspect Traditional Database Storage Graph Database (e.g., Neo4j) LLM Network Memory Definition Data is stored explicitly in tables, rows, and columns. Data is stored as nodes, edges, and properties, representing relationships. Data is encoded in the weights of a neural network as patterns and relationships. Accuracy High : Data is stored exactly as input, so retrieval is precise and deterministic. High : Relationships and connections are explicitly stored, enabling precise queries. Variable : LLMs generate responses based on learned patterns, which can lead to errors or approximations. Example If you store "2 + 2 = 4" in a database, it will always return "4" when queried. If you store "Alice is friends with Bob," the relationship is explicitly stored and retrievable. An LLM might c...

Economic Impact of New Tariffs on Canada, Mexico, China, and Europe

Tariffs as Federal Income 1. Tariff Revenue from Canada, Mexico, and China Using 2024 U.S. import projections (based on 2023 data from the U.S. Census Bureau and Trading Economics): Country 2024 Est. Imports (USD) Tariff Rate Revenue Generated Canada $420 billion 25% $105 billion Mexico $400 billion 25% $100 billion China $500 billion 10% + 10%* $100 billion Total $305 billion *China’s tariff is assumed to be a phased 10% + 10% (total 20%). 2. Tariff Revenue if Applied to All European Countries (25%) The U.S. imported $620 billion from the EU in 2023. Assuming 3% growth in 2024: 2024 EU Imports : $638 billion Revenue at 25% Tariff : $638B × 0.25 = $159.5 billion Combined Total Revenue (Canada, Mexico, China, EU) : $305B + $159.5B = $464.5 billion Spending the Extra Tariff Income 1. Trump’s Promised Tax Reductions Corporate Tax Cuts (21% → 15%) Current Federal Corporate Tax Revenue (2023) : $425 billion Projected Taxable I...

The Evolving Nexus: Risks of Stablecoin Integration with U.S. Sovereign Debt

I. Executive Summary This report examines the multifaceted risks arising from the increasing integration of stablecoins with U.S. sovereign debt. While direct "conversion" of outstanding debt into stablecoins is not the primary mechanism, the significant and growing role of stablecoins as purchasers of U.S. Treasuries introduces novel systemic vulnerabilities. The analysis highlights critical financial stability concerns, including de-pegging events and liquidity risks, alongside profound challenges to monetary policy and sovereign control. Furthermore, the fragmented regulatory landscape and persistent operational vulnerabilities amplify these risks. A robust, harmonized regulatory framework and proactive policy adaptation are imperative to mitigate these emerging challenges while strategically leveraging stablecoins' potential benefits for financial efficiency and the global standing of the U.S. dollar. Podcast II. Introduction: Stablecoins and the Landscape of Sovereig...